Tag Archives: Yang di-Pertuan Agong

Agong: Institusi Raja Jangan Diambil Mudah, Diperbuat Sesuka Hati

BERNAMA – KUALA LUMPUR 14 Jun – Rakyat diminta tidak mengambil mudah dan diperbuat sesuka hati institusi raja khususnya Yang di-Pertuan Agong dalam amalan Raja Berperlembagaan.

Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Sultan Muhammad V bertitah, ini kerana ia adalah institusi yang diiktiraf secara terang dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

<pJusteru, baginda bertitah, hal itu perlu diambil berat oleh semua pihak dan tidak mengikut budaya masyarakat Barat yang tindakan mereka bersandarkan emosi tanpa memikirkan kesan baik dan buruknya kepada negara.

“Institusi Yang di-Pertuan Agong pada hemat Beta, sewajibnya bukan sekadar diambil daripada sudut simbol semata-mata namun ketahuilah institusi ini ada tanggungjawab amat besar, apabila berlakunya sesuatu krisis dalam menstabilkan keadaan supaya tidak menjadi kemudaratan kepada rakyat dan negara,” titah baginda menerusi perutusan Aidilfitri yang disiarkan secara langsung menerusi RTM, malam ini.

Umat Islam di Malaysia akan menyambut Aidilfitri esok.

Baginda turut menyeru seluruh rakyat Malaysia supaya mengekalkan perpaduan dan keharmonian dengan menghulur tangan saling bermaaf-maafan dalam menyambut ketibaan 1 Syawal.

Sultan Muhammad V juga bertitah rakyat perlu menyuburkan budaya kunjung mengunjung di hari yang mulia ini bagi mengeratkan silaturahim.

“Hentikanlah dan lupakan pertelingkahan sesama umat sempena hari yang mulia ini. Jauhi fitnah memfitnah kerana dosa fitnah lebih dashyat daripada membunuh,” titah baginda.

Baginda turut bertitah bahawa masyarakat Melayu Islam khususnya akan hanya kekal diberkati jika bersendikan adat dan bertunjangkan syarak.

“Justeru, sempena menyambut Hari Lebaran Syawal yang mulia ini, jadikanlah apa yang Beta titahkan ini sebagai satu pesanan yang bermakna daripada raja kepada rakyat dan negara yang dikasihi.

“Beta harapkan semoga dengan tarbiah di madrasah Ramadan selama sebulan mampu menjadikan kita insan bertaqwa dan kembali kepada fitrah, yang bakal melahirkan modal insan yang berkualiti tinggi dan berintegriti untuk memacu reformasi ke arah mencapai negara maju.

“Makmur dan mendapat pengampunan Allah (Baldatun Toyyibatun wa Rabbun Ghafur),” titah baginda.

Dalam titah baginda, Sultan Muhammad V turut berpesan kepada rakyat yang pulang berhari raya di kampung halaman supaya mengutamakan keselamatan dalam perjalanan.

“Berhati-hati memandu, elakkan kemalangan supaya kita tidak bersedih dalam kegembiraan.

“Harapan beta semoga sambutan Aidilfitri kali ini memberi makna dan impak yang besar kepada kita dalam melaksanakan tugas sebagai hamba Allah Subhanahu Wata’ala dan khalifah di bumi Allah ini,” titah baginda.

Kadir Jasin Tepis Dakwaan Anwar

HARIAN METRO – DATUK A Kadir Jasin menafikan tuduhan Ketua Umum Pakatan Harapan (PH), Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang mendakwa beliau menggunakan kedudukannya yang dekat dengan kerajaan untuk menyerang Raja-Raja Melayu menerusi catatan blognya.

Ahli Majlis Pimpinan Tertinggi Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia (PPBM) itu berkata, catatan di dalam blognya adalah hanya pandangan peribadi dan tidak ada kena mengena dengan sebarang jawatan yang disandangnya.

Sehubungan itu, Kadir tidak berhasrat mencetuskan polemik dengan Anwar dan berharap sesiapa yang membaca catatannya semalam supaya memahami terlebih dahulu kandungan serta merujuk kepada rencananya di sebuah akhbar pada 27 Mei serta catatan lain yang ditulis di blognya, bertarikh 4 Jun lalu.

“Berkenaan tuduhan Saudara Anwar bahawa saya ‘menggunakan kedudukan saya yang dekat dengan kerajaan untuk menyerang Raja-Raja Melayu’ adalah tidak benar oleh sebab saya secara terbuka berkata dalam mukadimah tulisan saya bahawa segala pendapat adalah pandangan peribadi saya dan tidak ada kena mengena dengan sebarang jawatan yang mungkin saya sandang.

“Berkenaan dengan apa yang Anwar maksudkan sebagai ‘fakta yang boleh dipertikaikan’ itu, silalah pertikai dan berikanlah fakta yang betul. Kalau saya silap saya akan buat pembetulan dan saya mohon ampun.

“Saya tidak pertikai. Saya hanya berkata Raja-Raja tidak perlu jaminan atau keselesaan kerana kedudukan mereka dijamin oleh Perlembagaan.

“Saya tidak menafikan hakikat ‘Pakatan Harapan berusaha keras untuk mendapatkan sokongan Raja-Raja Melayu’. Cuma kemudian baru saya tahu bahawa selain Anwar, ada pemimpin lain PH yang menghadap Raja-Raja,” katanya dalam blognya, hari ini.

Semalam, Kadir dalam catatan blognya menulis kira-kira RM257 juta digunakan untuk perbelanjaan hidup dan peribadi Sultan Muhammad V dalam tempoh 16 bulan sejak dilantik sebagai Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

Kadir mendakwa purata RM16 juta sebulan dibelanjakan oleh Yang di-Pertuan Agong membabitkan penginapan, kediaman, barangan peribadi, pengangkutan dan pelbagai lagi perbelanjaan lain.

Susulan itu, Anwar membidas kenyataan Kadir yang menyifatkan kritikan itu dibuat tanpa memberi peluang kepada Raja-Raja Melayu untuk memberi maklum balas.

Anwar juga mahu Kadir menunjukkan penghormatan dan ketertiban dalam menyuarakan pandangan kerana kritikan berkenaan sebagai sesuatu yang tidak sihat jika menggunakan kedudukannya.

Pandangan Kadir itu turut mendapat maklum balas daripada Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad yang akan meneliti dakwaan peruntukan kepada Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Muhammad V dikatakan mencecah RM257 juta bagi tempoh Januari hingga April tahun ini.

PDRM Siasat A. Kadir Jasin

Berita Harian melaporkan bahawa Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM) membuka kertas siasatan selepas menerima tiga laporan polis yang dibuat terhadap wartawan veteran, Datuk A Kadir Jasin berhubung artikel tulisannya yang mendedahkan perbelanjaan Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Sultan Muhammad V.

Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Mohamad Fuzi Harun, berkata siasatan dilakukan mengikut Akta Hasutan 1948, Seksyen 233 Akta Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia (SKMM) dan Seksyen 500 Kanun Keseksaan dan akan diserahkan kepada pihak Timbalan Pendakwa Raya untuk tindakan selanjutnya sebaik saja lengkap siasatan.

Berita Harian juga melaporkan di dalam tulisan di blog peribadinya, wartawan veteran itu juga mendedahkan sebanyak RM257 juta digunakan untuk perbelanjaan hidup dan peribadi Sultan Muhammad V dalam tempoh 16 bulan sejak dilantik sebagai Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

Perlantikan Peguam Negara: Agong Zahirkan Dukacita Terhadap Laporan Negatif Media

Sila klik gambar untuk imej yang lebih besar.

Berita Harian melaporkan bahawa satu kenyataan media bertarikh 4 Jun telah dihantar Istana Negara kepada BERNAMA awal pagi ini yang ditandatangani oleh Datuk Pengelola Bijaya Diraja Istana Negara Datuk Wan Ahmad Dahlan Abdul Aziz.

Kenyataan media itu menyebut Yang di-Pertuan Agong menzahirkan rasa dukacita dan bimbang terhadap laporan media yang tidak tepat dan bersifat negatif kebelakangan ini, yang dilihat boleh mengancam keamanan dan keharmonian Malaysia.

Kenyataan media itu juga menegaskan bahawa Seri Paduka Baginda menitahkan Baginda mempunyai kewajipan untuk menegakkan peruntukan-peruntukan Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan memelihara hak-hak orang Melayu dan Bumiputera serta melindungi agama Islam.

DYMM Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Muhammad V telah memperkenankan pelantikan Tommy Thomas sebagai Peguam Negara.

Datuk Wan Ahmad Dahlan berkata atas nasihat Perdana Menteri Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Seri Paduka telah menitahkan perkara itu mengikut Perkara 145 (1) Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

LGE Lantik Pengkhianat Raja Sebagai Pegawai Penerangan Tentang Islam?

Penang Chief Minister’s Office today announced the appointment of PKR liberal activist Wan Ji Wan Hussin as the information officer “to help counter false narratives hurled at the state government on matters concerning Islam”.

The infamous Wan Ji whose plan to remove the monarchy system in Malaysia was exposed on video, took his oath of office before Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng in Komtar today.

And as a lawmaker, Lim Guan Eng must be aware that the Section 121B of the Penal Code says that anyone whoever compasses, imagines, invents or intends the deposition or deprivation of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong from the sovereignty of Malaysia shall be punished with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

For a state government to appoint a person who plans to bring down the Sultans who are Heads of Islam to a position related to Islamic matters is an insult to the Royal Institutions.

Or does Lim Guan Eng agrees with Wan Ji’s illegal plan as well?

Menjawab Dr. Ariffin Omar: Apa salahnya kalau Penang hendak dijadikan Christian city?

DAP’s senator, Dr. Ariffin Omar’s arrogant statement in the Dewan Negara on the 19th of April 2017 saying, “Apa salahnya kalau Penang hendak dijadikan Christian city” had enraged many Muslims.

It seems that the idea of turning Penang into a Christian city is alright to Arrifin, who is also the vice-chairman of DAP, as what he said in the Dewan Negara:

The DAP leader may think that with the power that DAP now has over Penang, DAP leaders can do anything, even interfering in the matters related to Islam.

Is this DAP’s good governance is all about?

The main issue here is, has the DAP man forgotten that in the Article 3(3) of the Federal Constitution, it is clearly written that the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong is the Head of the religion of Islam in Pulau Pinang?

The Constitution of the States of Malacca, Penang, Sabah and Sarawak shall each make provision for conferring on the Yang di-Pertuan Agong the position of Head of the religion of Islam in that State.

The DAP man must understand that it is the constitutional duty of the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong to “at all time protect the Religion of Islam”, as stated in the oath of office of the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong, or the Article 37(1); the text is written in Part I and III of the Fourth Schedule of the Federal Constitution.

And the Article 32(1) states that the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong is the Supreme Head of the Federation.

Although the state of Penang is now ruled by DAP, the Supreme Head of Penang is still the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong and not a DAP leader; hence the power of the Penang state government is not above the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong, especially in matters related to  the sovereignty of the state.

Having said that, Dr. Ariffin Omar’s arrogant statement is not merely rude but also offensive and might has the tendency to challenge and to deprive the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong from the sovereignty of Penang.

The Section 121B of the Penal Code says that anyone whoever compasses, imagines, invents or intends the deposition or deprivation of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong from the sovereignty of Malaysia shall be punished with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.

And the Section 121C(1) of the same Act says that whoever abets the commission of any of the offences punishable by section 121A or 121B shall be punished with the punishment provided for the said offences while the Section 121D(1) says that whoever knowing or having reason to believe that any offence punishable under section 121, 121A, 121B or 121C has been committed intentionally omits to give any information respecting that offence,which he is legally bound to give, shall be punished with imprisonmentfor a term which may extend to seven years or with fine or with both.

Dr. Ariffin’s offensive statement had enraged the Muslim, causing the feeling of enmity and hatred that can bring to the sate of disharmony or disunity on grounds of religion not only in Penang but also in the whole country.

The Section 298A(1) of the Penal Code states that whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs,or by visible representations, or by any act, activity or conduct, or by organizing, promoting or arranging, or assisting in organizing, promoting or arranging, any activity, or otherwise in any other
manner—
(a) causes, or attempts to cause, or is likely to cause disharmony, disunity, or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill will; or
(b) prejudices, or attempts to prejudice, or is likely to prejudice, the maintenance of harmony or unity,
on grounds of religion, between persons or groups of persons professing the same or different religions, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term of not less than two years and not more than five years.

It is a fundamental rule for lawmakers to understand the Supreme law of the land.

Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution states that:

Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions maybe practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.

The then Federal Court Judge, Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali in the Court of Appeal’s judgement of the case, Titular Roman Catholic Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur v. Menteri Dalam Negeri and Kerajaan Malaysia interpreted in peace and harmony” as:

It is my judgment that the purpose and intention of the insertion of the words: “in peace and harmony” in Article 3(1) is to protect the sanctity of Islam as the religion of the country and also to insulate against any threat faced or any possible and probable threat to the religion of Islam.

In the same judgment, Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali also states:

Any such disruption of the even tempo is contrary to the hope and desire of peaceful and harmonious co-existence of other religions other than Islam in this country.

Lawmakers must remember that Malaysia is governed by our rule of law and we are not a lawless country that practices absolute freedom.

Tan Sri Mohamed Apandi Ali in the above ruling also stated:

The alleged infringement of the fundamental liberties of the respondent can be negated by trite law that any freedom is not absolute. Freedom cannot be unfettered, otherwise, like absolute power, it can lead to chaos and anarchy. Freedom of speech and expression under Article 10(1) are subjected to restrictions imposed by law under Article 10(2)(a). Freedom of religion, under Article 11(1), as explained above is subjected to Article 11(4) and is to be read with Article 3(1).

Related Posts:

Editor-editor Media Mesti Disekolahkan Tentang Asas Kedaulatan Negara

[Karim’s Blog}- Membaca beberapa akhbar arus perdana dan liputan pelbagai portal berita berkaitan upacara pertabalan SPB YDP Agong Sultan Muhammad V, jelas menampakkan bahawa di kalangan wartawan dan ketua-ketua editor media, ramai yang masih tidak faham asas kedaulatan Negara serta Perlembagaan Persekutuan itu sendiri.

Kebanyakan media yang menyiarkan gambar YDPA mencium Al-Quran meletakkan ulasan (caption) “SULTAN Muhammad V mencium al-Quran iaitu lambang kemuliaan Islam sebagai agama rasmi negara pada Istiadat Pertabalan Yang di-Pertuan Agong XV di Istana Negara, semalam”

Ini adalah kesalahan besar dalam pemahaman tentang asas Negara dan kedudukan Islam di Tanah Air ini.

Sering kali media melaporkan bahawa “Islam Agama Rasmi” Malaysia. Malah ramai juga di kalngan pembesar Negara yang masih seing menggunakan slogan yang salah itu. Jika ada pun sesetengah Menteri yang sudah faham dengan menyebut Islam sebagai Agama Persekutuan atau Islam Agama Negara, tetapi apabila ianya dilaporkan oleh akhbar entah sama ada waratwan yang tidak petik dengan betul atau ketua-ketua editor yang tidak faham dengan asas Persekutuan Malaysia ini.

Perlembagaan Persekutuan adalah undang-undang utama Persekutuan seperti mana ditegaskan di dalam Perkara 4. Ini juga bermakna rangkap kata yang kita kerap dengar bahawa Islam itu adalah agama rasmi itu salah dan tidak berdasarkan Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

Kegagalan memahami perkara asas ini di kalangan petugas media dan ketua-ketua editor media membuat naratif yang salah ini diteruskan dan diulang-ulang. Mungkin perlu ada usaha untuk sekolahkan mereka ini agar penyampaian maklumat yang benar dapat disampaikan kepada masyarakat agar lebih fahami asas Negara yang bertunjangkan Agama Islam sejak dari kedaulatan pemerintahan Raja-Raja Melayu yang sudah beratus tahun.

Tawfik Tun Dr Ismail Wants Jakim Abolished

Today TMI publishes an article regarding their interview with former Deputy Prime Minister’s son, Tawfik Ismail who is another member of G25, about the religious authorities in Malaysia.

Tawfik who is Tun Dr. Ismail’s eldest son said that he wants the days when JAKIM did not exist and ‘no one batted an eye when Muslims owned dogs’.

It is so sad to see a son of a great and good man turning into a liberal who are against the religious authorities in Malaysia.

G25 ‘attacked’ the religious authorities in its open letter dated December 7, 2014.

I’ll try to answer Tawfik’s uncalled and rude statement; TMI’s article is in red and my answer is in blue.

There was a time in the country’s history when the Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim) did not exist, Putrajaya did not tell Malaysians how to practise their faith, and no one batted an eye when Muslims owned dogs.

And the former deputy prime minister Tun Dr Ismail Abdul Rahman’s eldest son, Tawfik Ismail, wants those days back.

I am very sad if that is what Tun Dr Ismail Abdul Rahman’s eldest son, Tawfik Ismail really wants. He is a Muslim but he does not want the Islamic authorities to uphold Islam; very odd. He seems to be confused about Islam and he needs help from JAKIM to go back to the right path of Islam.

The main step is to dissolve Jakim, Tawfik said during an interview in conjunction with the release of “Drifting into Politics”, a collection of his late father’s writings during the nation’s formative years, edited by Tawfik and academic Ooi Kee Beng.

Jakim was created during Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s time and seems to serve no other purpose than to intervene in the personal lives of Malaysians, Tawfik told The Malaysian Insider when met at his house in Taman Tun Dr Ismail.

“I think Jakim should be abolished. I don’t think Jakim should exist. What is the government afraid of? You have 13 muftis with 13 different fatwas and 13 different ways of approaching it (religion).

Abolish JAKIM? Tawfik Ismail does not understand the function of JAKIM. Article 37 says that the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong must take his oath to protect the religion of Islam before exercising his functions. JAKIM is one of the authorities appointed to carry the duty to protect Islam and uphold Islam on behalf of the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong. (Please click here for the oath.)

As an Islamic country, we have different Islamic authorities and each has its own duty. It will be impossible for the mufti do everything.

“What is the purpose of Jakim? Halal certificates? That can go to the health ministries, trade ministry. What else does Jakim do? Print the Quran? We have a communications minister,” said the softspoken, yet candid, 64-year-old former MP.

Do not belittle JAKIM for protecting and upholding Islam. Regarding the halal certificates, it is a very serious matter to the Muslims, not only in Malaysia but all over the world. In fact JAKIM’s halal certificates are recognised by Muslim bodies all over the world. The health or trade ministries cannot certify that something is halal because they are not Islamic experts.

Naysayers may argue that Jakim is needed to “protect” the sanctity of Islam, but Tawfik was quick to point out that the Agong, sultans, imams (Muslim scholars) and muftis already filled that void.

The Yang Di-Pertuan Agong, Sultans, imams and the muftis have their duties to protect the sanctity of Islam and so is JAKIM. JAKIM as the Federal Islamic authority, works under the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong while the muftis are under the State authorities, working under their respective Sultans.

“Jakim is an advisory body to the government, but constitutionally it really has no role. Islam is the province of the sultan of the state, it has nothing to do with the government.”

I do not agree with the above statement. Malaysia is an Islamic country, because Islam is the religion of the Federation as written in Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution. And constitutionally, JAKIM has a role to uphold Article 3(1) and carry the duty of the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong as in Article 37(1) to protect Islam.

So which areas of Muslim life should the government intervene in? Tawfik flat-out said nothing at all.

“National integration in this country is the biggest challenge. How do you integrate the nation if you are going around this route of looking for faults among Muslims?” he asked.

But, Tawfik clarified that his views on dismantling Jakim were his own, and that G25, the group of retired Malay top civil servants of which he is a member, did not share them.

Please understand our Federal Constitution. In the judgment of ZI Publications v Government of Selangor, The Right Honourable Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Md Raus bin Sharif concluded that:

Taking the Federal Constitution as a whole, it is clear that it was the intention of the framers of our Constitution to allow Muslims in this country to be also governed by Islamic personal law. Thus, a Muslim in this country is therefore subjected to both the general laws enacted by Parliament and also the State laws enacted by the Legislature of a State.

G25 does, however, want Jakim to justify its existence as well as the hundreds of millions of ringgit it receives from the federal budget each year, which he said could have been funnelled to the Health or Education Ministry instead.

The Government allocated funds to all federal departments, including the Islamic authorities. The problem is, why is Tawfik against the Islamic department getting allocation from the federal budget? Is Islam not important to him? As a Muslim he must put Islam as the most important thing in his life.

“I think there’s a subversion of the constitution by religious authorities at the state level where they are actually testing the limits that they can go in intruding on a person’s personal life,” he added.

It’s to fix a person’s belief or akidah, not ‘intruding on a person’s personal life’.

Putrajaya had not always acted as the defender of the people’s faith, revealed Tawfik, who served as MP from 1986 to 1990.

He said that during the time of Malaysia’s first prime minister, Tunku Abdul Rahman, only a small religious department existed in the Prime Minister’s Department.

Our Islamic authorities are doing their best to protect Islam and the akidah of the Muslims in Malaysia. As a Malaysian, he must be proud to see the small religious department grows into what it is now and hope it will be better in the future and not the other way around. 

There was no minister of religious affairs, and no national outcry over the fact that his father, Tun Dr Ismail, owned a dog.

“My dad had a Boxer, and, before that, an Alstatian,” recalled Tawfik.

He said all this changed after Dr Mahathir took over and his then deputy, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, tried to infuse their definition of “Islamic values” into every aspect of Malaysian life.

People must not be proud of doing things against their religions. He is a liberalist but he cannot expect other Muslims to be liberal because it is against Islam. Spreading liberal teaching to the Muslims is against the Article 11(4) of the Federal Constitution.

It is good to promote Islamic values into every aspect of Malaysian life. Islam is not only ritual but Islam is the way of life. And every Muslim must be subjected to the Islamic laws.

This was done to counter the growing influence of PAS, which had never been an issue during the early years of Independence, said Tawfik.

As a result, Malaysia today is now facing “Arabisation”, with society eschewing its Nusantara roots in favour of appropriating the culture of the Middle East, he said.

What does he mean by Arabisation? Is it the Muslim clothing and way of life? Then why didn’t he complain about Westernisation; where people wear miniskirts, coats, ties and others? If he wants to preserve our Nusantara roots, we should also put away the Western way of life. Is it alright for him when the “society eschewing its Nusantara roots in favour of appropriating the culture of the” West?

“We seem to be delighting in coming up with creative ways of ‘speaking’ Arabic in this country.”

Arabic is the language of the Qur’an. It’s very important to learn Arabic and it’s also good to learn other languages. I’m learning German. Why didn’t he complain about Malays learning Chinese, or Indian, or even European languages like German?

Tawfik said it was for this reason that Drifting Into Politics may not sit very well with Putrajaya.

“Certain things my father says here are quite interesting.

“For example, he said whenever Tunku had a meeting at his house with a group of people… occasionally one or two of them would go into the kitchen and have a drink of brandy and whisky, then come back and join in. He admits this.

Is he proud of that? First, brandy and whisky are against Islam. Secondly. even non-Muslims must not drink alcohol during meetings, because how can one focus with the effect of alcohol? I can’t imagine having a country led by people who drink brandy and whisky during important meetings.

“Yes, it’s an open secret, but it’s never been in writing by a leader,” chuckled Tawfik.

His father died in 1973 at the age of 57, after just three years of serving as deputy prime minister. November 4 was his 100th birth anniversary.

With such records in existence, no matter how it tried to Islamise Malaysia, Tawfik said, the government would never be able to rewrite history nor erase its roots. – November 9, 2015.

As a Muslim, even if that is true, he must not be proud of something haram. I pity his father who was a good man.

Tawfik should learn history. Malaysia came from Malaya, and before that, the Federated Malay States which was formed from nine different sovereign Islamic countries; the sovereign Malay States. He should attend one of Datin Paduka Datuk Professor Dr. Ramlah Adam’s talk, then he can understand more about our roots.

Eric Paulsen Slanders JAKIM

Screenshot_1Human Rights lawyer, Eric Paulsen wrote on his twitter page on the 9th January that:

“JAKIM is promoting extremism every Friday. Govt needs to address that if serious about extremism in Msia.”

As a lawyer who claims to be fighting for Human Rights, Eric Paulsen must not make such false accusations towards others.

And if JAKIM does promote extremism “every Friday”, then I suppose JAKIM will not publish their Friday sermon for the whole world to see.

As a lawyer, Eric Paulsen must learn about the Federal Constitution and understand the Article 3(1), which says:

“Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions maybe practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.”

First of all every citizen of Malaysia must accept and respect the fact that Islam is the religion of the Federation because that is an important part of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

According to Dato’ Naser Disa, a very senior lawyer who is also our constitution expert, the words, “but other religions maybe practised in peace and harmony” means that the followers of other religions must practise their religions in peace and harmony with others from other religions especially Islam, which is the religion of the Federation of Malaysia; and not to cause uneasiness towards the Muslims.

It does not mean that Islam and the Muslims must obey them and they can do anything to Islam.

Eric Paulsen’s harsh words had cause anger among the Muslims and that is already wrong because there will be no more “peace and harmony” as written in Article 3(1).

And non-Muslims has no rights to set the rules for the Muslim of how to practise Islam.

Has Eric Paulsen forgotten the Article 11(3)(a)?

Article 11(3)(a):

“Every religious group has the right—
(a) to manage its own religious affairs;”

Eric Paulsen and his friends always use Article 11(3)(a) when it suits them but now he is the one who rudely interfere with not just another religion’s affairs but the affairs of the religion of the Federation.

Eric Paulsen also bashed the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Dato’ Sri Khalid bin Abu Bakar and told him to be “neutral and impartial” after the IGP tweeted that Eric Paulsen should be arrested under the Sedition Act.

Screenshot_2

After all he had said, Eric Paulsen again tweeted that, “criticising Jakim should not be construed as insulting Islam” which I think is a lame excuse that could only be agreed by his friends who really hates the government.

Worst is Eric Paulsen does not criticise JAKIM but he slandes JAKIM and unfairly tarnish the Islamic authority.

JAKIM is the official Islamic authority in Malaysia and so, if he insults JAKIM, then it means that he also insults Islam, which is the religion of the Federation.

Eric also re tweeted some of Lawyer For Liberty tweets about some of JAKIM’s Friday sermons, including sermons about Surah Al-Baqarah Verse 120 and also about Syi’ah.

Like Lim Kit Siang who also thinks that he has the rights to interfere and complain about the verse from Quran, Eric Paulsen must understand that they are not a Muslims, so they do not understand the concept of Islam and have no rights to teach  JAKIM and the Muslim about the verses from the Quran and other parts of our religion.

What is wrong when JAKIM warned the Muslims of Syi’ah which is a deviant teaching?

From his accusations, it shows that he knows nothing about Islam so it is silly for him to argue and fight about something he does not know or understand.

As a lawyer, Eric Paulsen must understand that the head of Islam is the Sultans and the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and he has no rights to control Jakim or the Muslims.

I am very sad to see a lawyer who fights against the law instead of fighting for the law.

Malaysia Can Extradite So-Called Sulu Sultan

PETALING JAYA (The Star) : Malaysia can seek the extradition of self-proclaimed Sulu Sultan Jamalul Kiram III from the Philippines to face the law over the intrusion into Sabah, legal experts said.

They said Malaysia’s arrest and extradition of Moro National Libera­tion Front leaderc to the Philippines in 2001 following a request by that country had set a precedent for cooperation in dealing with such cases.

Muslim Lawyers Association of Malaysia Datuk Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar said the culprits, including those based in Philippines such as Jamalul Kiram, needed to be brought to Malaysia to face criminal charges of waging war against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, an offence under the Penal Code that is punishable by death upon conviction.

“Our sovereignty has been challenged and while Malaysia wanted to avoid bloodshed they started firing, triggering action which resulted in our security personnel dead, which means there is no more room to forgive them,” said Zainul.

He added that since Jamalul Kiram did not directly take up weapons in Malaysian territory, he could be investigated for abetting to wage war, which also carries the death penalty upon conviction.

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) Associate Professor Shamrahayu A. Aziz said the charge could be used against the culprits even if they were not Malaysian citizens because what mattered was where the crime was committed.

“It is also possible for Malaysia to request the extradition of a person who is not in our country if we can prove that the instructions came from him or that he instigated or incited the actions,” she said.

Emeritus Professor of Law at Univ­er­s­iti Teknologi Mara Prof Datuk Shad Saleem Faruqi said many Sections in Chapter 6 of the Penal Code could be used against the culprits.

He said Malaysians in Lahad Datu, who had given protection to the intruders, could also be charged under Section 125A of the Act, which makes it an offence to harbour any person in Malaysia or a foreign country who is at war or considered hostile against the King.

In addition, Shad Faruqi said the culprits could also be charged under the newly included Section 6A of the Penal Code, which deals with offences relating to terrorism.