Tag Archives: Wikipedia

Gobind Singh: Malaysia Is A Secular State – Another Fairy Tale?

GSDThe opposition parties tried hard to prove that Malaysia is a Secular State just because they want Malaysia to be a Secular State .

(Please read: Is Malaysia A Secular State?)

DAP Puchong MP Gobind Singh Deo said that Malaysia is proven to be a secular state by referring to Che’ Omar bin Che’ Soh v Public Prosecutor.

As a lawyer he must understands that Che’ Omar bin Che’ Soh v Public Prosecutor is no longer a good law because it was decided before the coming into effect of Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution.

Furthermore, in Che’ Omar bin Che’ Soh v Public Prosecutor, Tan Sri Salleh Abbas did not say that Malaysia is a secular nation but Tan Sri Salleh Abbas only said that secular laws were used.

By the way, does Gobind Singh Deo understand what is a Secular State?

Wikipedia wrote that:

“A secular state is a concept of secularism, whereby a state or country purports to be officially neutral in matters of religion, supporting neither religion nor irreligion. A secular state also claims to treat all its citizens equally regardless of religion, and claims to avoid preferential treatment for a citizen from a particular religion/nonreligion over other religions/nonreligion. Secular states do not have a state religion (established religion) or equivalent, although the absence of a state religion does not necessarily mean that a state is fully secular; however, a true secular state should steadfastly maintain national governance without influence from religious factions; i.e. Separation of church and state.”

Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution says that:

“Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions may be practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation”.

In Meor Atiqul Rahman v Fatimah Sihi and others, Judge Yang Arif Dato’ Mohd Noor Abdullah explained that:

“Islam ialah ugama bagi persekutuan tapi ugama-ugama lain boleh diamalkan dalam aman dan damai. Islam adalah ugama utama di antara ugama-ugama lain yang dianuti di negara seperti Kristian, Buddha, Hindu. Islam bukan setaraf dengan ugama lain. bukan duduk berganding bahu dengan agama lain atau berdiri sama sama tegak. Ia duduk di atas, berjalan dahulu, terletak di tempat medan, dan suaranya lantang kedengaran. Islam ibarat pokok jati. Tinggi, teguh, dan terang. Jika bukan sedemikian, Islam bukanlah ugama bagi persekutuan, tetapi adalah salah satu di antara beberapa ugama yang dianuti di wilayah ini, dan setiap orang sama-sama bebas mengamalkan mana-mana ugama yang dianuti. Tiada lebih di antara satu sama lain.”

And in the case of Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan, the then Chief Justice, Yang Amat Arif Tun Ahmad Fairus said:

“Islam itu bukan sahaja suatu himpunan dogma-dogma dan ritual-ritual tetapi ianya juga suatu cara hidup yang lengkap merangkumi semua bidang aktiviti manusia, persendirian dan awam, perundangan, politik, ekonomi, sosial, budaya, moral atau kehakiman etc.”

With those statements, it proves that Malaysia is not a Secular State because Malaysia has a state religion, that is Islam; and “secular states do not have a state religion”; therefore Malaysia is not officially neutral in matters of religion (as what was said in the ruling of Meor Atiqul Rahman v Fatimah Sihi and others) and “nonreligion” is against the first Rukun Negara or National Principles of Malaysia which says, “Kepercayaan Kepada Tuhan” or “Belief in God”.

How could a lawyer like MP Gobind Singh Deo forget Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution and the Rukun Negara?

And the DAP MP could only remember a small part of the case of Che’ Omar bin Che’ Soh v Public Prosecutor but forgot about more important cases like Meor Atiqul Rahman v Fatimah Sihi and others and Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan.

Mr. Gobind Singh Deo, please be a good and responsible Malaysian citizen and please stop spinning stories and please respect the Federal Constitution.

Not everybody in Malaysia can be fooled by oppositions fairy tales. 

Related Posts:

DAP vs Tan Sri Khalid And His Aku Janji


Anwar For MB: Wikipedia Dah Pening

This morning, Cucu Tok Selampit wrote a post about “Wikipedia sudah meroyan” or Wikipedia had gone ‘crazy’.

This is a screenshot inserted in the post…

Photo credit to Cucu Tok Selampit

Photo credit to Cucu Tok Selampit. Please click the photo for a larger image.

Well, I checked Wikipedia’s ‘List of Menteris Besar of Selangor’ at 3:51 p.m. and this was what I saw …


Now look who is the new MB of Selangor 😉


And at 4:05 p.m., I checked the list again …


Now a ‘Tokey Satay’ from the Party Satay is the new MB!

But the best was what I saw at 6.25 p.m. …

My sisters and I were stunned when we saw this!

Then, we had a good laugh. 

My Father from the Party MUAFAKAT?

Wow!  My sisters and I were stunned when we saw this! And after that, we had a good laugh.  So now MUAFAKAT has become a political party?

And at 9.19 p.m.,

At 9:19

At 9:19 p.m.

And I wonder who’s next …

Related post:

  1. Selangor PKR Crisis: Khalid Resigning?
  2. Selangor MB Crisis: Apa Kata Anwar?

Photomontages By Jim Kazanjian

(Photo by Jim Kazanjian)

(Photo by Jim Kazanjian)

The above photo looks like a photo of a weird  flooded lighthouse under construction.

It is one of the very creative works by Jim Kazanjian  using a technique called photomontage.

Lots of different photos were used to create the above photo.

Wikipedia wrote that, photomontage is the process and the result of making a composite photograph by cutting and joining two or more photographs into an illusion of an unreal subject.”

I think that Jim Kazanjian’s works are great.

Here are more photomontage by  Jim Kazanjian.

(Please click the pictures for larger images)